Colorado Proposition 119- Yes or No

Creation of Out-of-School Education Program and Marijuana Sales Tax Increase Initiative

Proposition 119

It would create the Learning Enrichment and Academic Progress Program, LEAP Program. Eligible children would include children at least five years of age and no older than 17 years who are eligible for admission to Colorado public schools. The program would provide out-of-school services that would consist of but not be limited to the following:  tutoring in core subject areas; enrichment opportunities including music, dance, and art programs; instruction in English and foreign languages; career and technical training; emotional and physical therapy; mental health services; special support for students with special needs; and mentoring.

The measure would increase the marijuana retail sales tax incrementally from 15% to 20% to partially fund the program. Beginning January 2022, an additional 3% marijuana retail tax would be levied for a total of 18%. Beginning January 2023, the additional tax would increase to 4% for a total of 19%. After January 2024, the additional tax would increase to 5% for a total tax of 20% on marijuana retail sales. It is estimated that once the increase is fully in effect, it would generate an additional $137.6 million a year. The tax would not apply to medical marijuana. Beginning in January 2022, the state treasurer would be required to transfer the revenue generated from the additional marijuana tax to the Learning Enrichment and Academic Progress Fund monthly. Any revenue the state collects from the increased marijuana sales tax would be considered a voter-approved revenue change and exempt from the TABOR state spending limit.  Additionally, the state would also transfer $22 million from the State Land Trust to help pay for this new program. That money would otherwise go to general school funding.

The Details

  • Proposition 119 would not pay for K-12 in-school education or teacher needs. School districts get their funding through your property taxes.
  • The LEAP Program will only cover out-of-school learning and enrichment, such as: tutoring, targeted assistance for those with special needs, second language training, social emotional and mental health services.  The money cannot be used for tuition or for materials that are part of school curriculum.
  • Students from low-income families, and those not proficient in their grade level, would be prioritized for financial aid. They could be eligible for at least $1,500 a year for those outside-of-school learning and enrichment options.
  • The providers of the out-of-school help will be required to be certified by the new LEAP  Program. Parents or immediate family members will not be allowed to be providers for their kids.
  • The program will be managed by a new created Colorado Learning Authority, overseen by a board of directors. That authority would certify tutors and enrichment programs as eligible for funding and distribute money to families, with a priority on those at or below the poverty line. The Governor would appoint the board members.
  • The advisory board will have total control over the increase of tax revenue and the $22 million Land Trust money reserved for Colorado schools.  There is no requirement in the bill that allows for public accountability or spending limits.  If there is any excess money, the schools have no right to those funds.  Without oversight or accountability, the appointed board of advisors will develop its own criteria for selecting providers. The proposition does not guarantee that vendors will be approved in all areas of the state, which means that rural areas may not be represented.  There is no protection against any kind of discrimination by the providers.
  • With the transfer of $22 million from the State Land Trust to help pay for this new program, it essentially takes money already designated to support public schools.  The State Land Trust generates revenue through mineral leases, grazing leases, etc. This transfer would mean that money will be withdrawn annually from the schools and going to private, and possibly for-profit corporations. According to the Legislative Council’s non-partisan summary, this would cost public schools at least $ 21 million a year. The Colorado State Land Board unanimously voted against LEAP.
  • LEAP is advertised as a program for disadvantaged children, but there is no guarantee that these will be the students who will be served. Students only need to be eligible to attend public school. However, their families will have to prove their income for tax purposes, which means that undocumented students are not entitled. But schoolchildren and private students who were taught at home would also be entitled, which makes LEAP a quasi-voucher program. The weakest students are only guaranteed a focus in the first year!
  • This proposal would empower parents to pick a tutoring or after-school program that best fits their child’s developmental needs. The measure would prioritize students from low-income families who otherwise couldn’t afford the supplemental services by giving them the first shot at receiving benefits under the program. But the success or a failure of the proposal depends on the service providers approved and the ability of low-income parents to navigate the system for applying for the funds and accessing those providers.

Why tax only the Cannabis industry?

A big question is, if Proposition 119 is so wonderful for the kids, why weren’t other industries included?  The answer is that it’s easier getting approval for a tax increase by limiting it to the marijuana industry then proposing an increase in tax on manufacturing, energy, tourism, agriculture, financial services, real estate or even the entertainment industries.  And of course, proposing a tax increase on the luxury suites at Empower Field, Coors Field, Ball Arena or even game day tickets would not be easy approved and very costly.  Colorado voters have an easier time approving tax increases on cigarettes, gaming, and marijuana over other industries. 

This tax increase is a way for state legislatures to cover funding issues in the state budget.  The question is: How often can the state go back to the “cannabis well” for tax revenue? If Proposition 119 is approved and the cumulative 5% tax is added to the existing 15%.  With local municipalities taxing the sale of the plant and throw on additional city taxes along the way, most Coloradans will be paying 30% or more in taxes on their marijuana purchases.   When could we, or will we see a decrease in marijuana sales in Colorado? California was the first state to pass legislation for medical marijuana and it was among the first to join Colorado in legal recreational use.  But the problem California encountered was that lawmakers were not afraid to tax cannabis at a very high rate resulting in lower sales in legal dispensaries and flourishing black market.

In Summary

Is Proposal 119 totally bad?  No, the intent of the proposal is good for schools, children, and parents.  The real problem is in the details. Yes, the cannabis industry does not want to see additional taxes which potentially hurt the industry. 

On the education side, The Colorado Parent Teacher Association also opposes the measure. Similarly, the board of directors of the Colorado Association of School Boards voted to oppose Proposition 119. The Colorado Education Association, the state’s largest teacher’s union, initially supported Proposition 119 but has since shifted its position to neutral. The union says there isn’t enough information about how the program would be implemented and what kind of oversight will be in place.

For now, as it is written, Proposition 119 is not in the best interest for Colorado.

Write a Review